What type of jurisdiction does the Board of Inquiry have over minor infractions?

The Board of Inquiry operates under executive jurisdiction when addressing minor infractions within its purview. This type of jurisdiction enables the Board to take definitive action and make decisions regarding matters that fall under their authority, especially in the context of governance and adherence to the established rules.

Executive jurisdiction allows the Board to exercise its powers, including investigating, adjudicating, and imposing penalties for infractions, ensuring that regulatory compliance is maintained in a structured manner. This authority is essential for the efficient functioning of the organization and for upholding the integrity of the sport.

In contrast, exclusive jurisdiction typically implies that only one entity has control over a certain area, which isn’t applicable here as the Board may share responsibilities with other entities. Advisory jurisdiction suggests a role of providing recommendations rather than enforcing decisions, which is not aligned with the Board’s capabilities in the case of minor infractions. Shared jurisdiction indicates that multiple bodies have authority over an issue, which dilutes the Board’s role as a leading authority in executive matters. Thus, executive jurisdiction is the most accurate description of the Board of Inquiry's abilities concerning minor infractions.